SocialFunds.com
Please support our sponsors



Subscribe to Free weekly SRI News Alerts

Keyword Search
Find SRI News Articles Related To:

Complete List of Articles by Category

RSS
What is RSS?
Add to MyYahoo

Please support our sponsors


Recent News Headlines from SocialFunds.com

Dynegy Abandons Plans to Build Five New Coal Power Plants (01/06/09)

Wells Fargo Exceeds Environmental Financing Goals (12/30/08)

Report Warns of Unsustainable Consumption (12/24/08)


Sustainability Investment News Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it  

April 10, 2001

Do You Own Nuclear Power Stock?

Well-known conventional mutual funds and asset managers are looking to catch profits from nuclear power’s revival.

SocialFunds.com -- Just when you thought nuclear power was going out for the count, deregulation, global warming fears and ever-increasing demand are bringing nuclear power back into the limelight. Many observers of California’s rolling blackouts are beginning to consider nuclear power as one of the viable answers to the nation’s energy problems.

Please support
our sponsorsOver the past few years there have been two companies snapping up nuclear power plants across the U.S. One is "Entergy (ticker: ETR), a global energy company based in New Orleans with power production, distribution operations, and related diversified services. It currently operates eight nuclear units at seven sites in the southern and northeastern regions of the U.S.

The other is Amergen, which is a joint venture between British Energy PLC (BGY) and Exelon (EXC). Exelon is the product of a 1999 merger between the Philadelphia Electric Company (PECO) and Unicom. Exelon is one of the nation's largest electric utilities and is now the largest nuclear operator in the United States. With 14 reactors from the PECO-Unicom merger and the six reactors purchased since by Amergen, Exelon has a stake in 20 reactors, which is nearly 20 percent of U.S. nuclear power generating capacity.

Many social investors screen out nuclear power because they believe the potential of another Chernobyl overshadows any benefit of cheap electricity. It seems that the general investing public, however, does not have qualms if the companies can return a profit. With mergers and so many nuclear plants changing hands recently, it is worthwhile to check briefly who owns a piece of Entergy and Exelon.

The mutual fund that likes Entergy the most is Vanguard’s Windsor-II Fund (ticker: VWNFX). Windsor-II, a large-cap value fund, has committed 2.58 percent of its portfolio to Entergy. Its 16.3 million shares translate to a market value of over $632 million dollars (all figures in this article for shares owned, market value of shares and percent of portfolio are taken from reports dating between 1/31/00 and 12/31/00).

The Vanguard 500 Index Fund (VFIAX), the largest mutual fund in the U.S. in terms of asset size, owns sizable chunks of both Entergy and Exelon. This is by default, as the premise of this passively managed fund is to mirror the S&P 500’s price and yield results. The Vanguard Wellington Fund (VWELX) also has Exelon in its portfolio, with its 2.6 million shares valued at around $172 million.

American Funds Group likes the prospects of Exelon enough to have one of its funds be the top mutual fund investor. The Income Fund of America (AMECX) has devoted 1.47 percent of its portfolio to Exelon, with its 4.5 million shares worth approximately $293 million.

The Vanguard Group, Fidelity Management & Research Company, Barclays Global Investors, N.A., State Street Global Advisors and Brandes Investment Partners LP stood out as asset managers that were among the top 15 institutional investors in both Entergy and Exelon.

Through advances and improvements, nuclear power plants can be run at a much higher efficiency now than when they were built twenty or thirty years ago. The potential for human error, however, has not changed; in fact, competitive pressure from deregulation may increase that possibility.

According to the Nuclear Information and Resource Service & World Information Service on Energy (NIRS/WISE), British Energy, one of the owners of Amgen, may be putting the bottom line ahead of safety. After becoming a private company in 1996, British Energy implemented the cost-cutting measure of laying off workers and replacing them with contractors. In 1999 report, the British regulatory agency Nuclear Installations Inspectorate (NII) wrote that at one of the prime contractors, “not all of the partnership staff…are fully qualified or experienced to perform necessary analyses, nor are they fully familiar with the nuclear plants they are expected to undertake work on.”

The other half of Amergen has a spotted history also. PECO, which is now part of Exelon, was a recipient of one of the highest nuclear-related fines in U.S. history. It was assessed the penalty when operators at its Peach Bottom nuclear complex were found sleeping and playing computer games on the job.

With more plants being concentrated in fewer hands, nuclear power will be easier for social investors and anti-nuclear activists to monitor. But everyone should be thinking twice about the wisdom of putting market competition pressure on nuclear generating facilities. The consequences of cutting too many corners could be grave indeed.

© SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it

Top

Mutual Funds | Community Investing | News | Sustainability Reports | Corporate Research | Shareowner Actions | Financial Services | Conferences
Home | Login | Contact | Support This Site | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints


© 1998-2008 SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Created and maintained by
SRI World Group web development services
Do your own research Work with an advisor SRI News SRI Learning Center Home