|
December 12, 2003
Book Review--How Does it Pay to Be Green?
by William Baue
An empirical study finds a positive relationship between environmental and economic performance
when environmental strategies are factored into business decisions.
SocialFunds.com --
How Does it Pay to Be
Green? brings the business case for corporate environmental responsibility a step closer to
the tipping point. However, the book is not likely to push it over the edge into widespread
acceptance for a number of reasons. A glance at the subtitle suggests the first reason: An
Analysis of the Relationship between Environmental and Economic Performance at the Firm Level and
the Influence of Corporate Environmental Strategy Choice. This alone will scare off readers,
and when they discover the book is a revised dissertation written for a German doctorate, they may
run and hide. The fact that it is only available from German publisher Tectum-Verlag does not
help.
Readers interested in socially responsible
investing (SRI) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) should not shy away from the book,
though, for several reasons. First, the book is in very readable English, and employs academic
jargon only when necessary. Most importantly, the book presents very thorough arguments for
companies to develop environmental strategies and for investors to consider the positive
relationship between a firm’s environmental strategies and its economic performance. If not
required reading, the study at the very least warrants SRI and CSR advocates’ familiarity
with its conclusions.
“The objective of this research is to establish the
relationship between the environmental performance and economic performance at the firm level in
the European Union (EU), and to analyse the influence of corporate environmental strategy choice on
the environmental competitiveness of firms,” writes author Marcus Wagner.
Dr.
Wagner conducts research on environmental management strategies under the Chair of Corporate
Environmental Management at the University of Lueneburg in Germany and the Centre for Environmental Strategy at the University of
Surrey in the UK.
The empirical research proceeds in a two-step approach. First, the
study examines the physical environmental performance indicators of companies in the pulp and paper
industry in four EU countries (Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Great Britain) in relationship
to their short-term profitability.
This research finds that pulp and paper firms’
environmental performance do not seem to influence the tracked economic measures much, which is
consistent with the theoretical proposition outlined in the excellent literature review section of
the book. (This literature review alone is worth the price of admission, as it summarizes the
“traditionalist” view that a negative relationship exists between economic and
environmental performance and the “revisionist” view that a sometimes-positive
relationship exists.)
The first phase findings do suggest, however, that corporate
environmental strategies (CES) may have an important influence on economic performance, so this
relationship is next examined.
“[F]irms that actively pursue a value-oriented CES
seem to be most likely to achieve a positive relationship between environmental and economic
performance,” writes Dr. Wagner. “Opposed to this, firms, which do not actively pursue
such a strategy, seem to be less likely to bring about such a positive relationship.”
“One key factor for a positive relationship seems to be strategy choice by the
firm,” he continues. “One key factor for a negative relationship seems to be sector
membership of a firm.”
Namely, firms in environmentally intensive sectors may have
trouble creating a positive relationship between environmental and economic performance. However,
these companies can neutralize their predisposition to a negative relationship through
environmental strategizing.
The book ends with some recommendations, though the public
policy suggestions are rather generalized. The future research proposals, on the other hand,
sketch a roadmap tipping the business case for corporate environmental responsibility into the
mainstream.
©
SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Top
|