SocialFunds.com
Please support our sponsors



Subscribe to Free weekly SRI News Alerts

Keyword Search
Find SRI News Articles Related To:

Complete List of Articles by Category

RSS
What is RSS?
Add to MyYahoo

Please support our sponsors


Recent News Headlines from SocialFunds.com

Nine More Countries Added to MicroPlace (05/09/08)

New Social Awareness Index Started (05/09/08)

Proxy Voting Made Painless (05/07/08)


Sustainability Investment News Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it  

February 01, 2001

SEC Asked to Enforce Its Environmental Disclosure Rules
    by Philip Johansson

Socially responsible financial firm and international think-tank believe shareholders need more information about their companies' environmental risks.

SocialFunds.com -- Shareholders are being exposed to financial risk from corporate environmental performance, yet companies inadequately disclose information about that risk. This is the claim being made by The World Resources Institute (WRI), a Washington, D.C.-based environmental research group, and the Calvert Group, a Bethesda, Maryland-based socially responsible mutual fund company. The two called on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to clarify and bolster the enforcement of existing rules, as well as issue disclosure guidelines for companies.

Free
SRI Mutual Funds Guide"Few companies do a good job of reporting on environmental liabilities and risks," declared Dr. Julie Fox Gorte, Calvert's senior environmental and technology analyst. "Our research shows that companies with significantly different environmental performance and risks are often indistinguishable from each other when evaluated by their annual reports. This lack of transparency could pose a heightened risk for investors," she added.

WRI's and Calvert's assertions are based on the findings of two reports issued by WRI: "Pure Profit: The Financial Implications of Environmental Performance," and Coming Clean: Corporate Disclosure of Financially Significant Environmental Risks." In the studies, WRI applied its own method for evaluating environmental risks to 13 pulp and paper companies. Co-authors Dr. Robert Repetto and Duncan Austin concluded that environmental issues had the potential to affect input costs, revenues, asset values, competitive advantage and shareholder value.

Results showed that over half of the companies could expect negative financial impacts from environmental issues. These negative impacts were estimated to be at least 5 percent of total shareholder value. Some companies faced negative impacts approaching or exceeding 10 percent.

In spite of these findings, an examination of the 10K, 10Q and 8K reports filed by the companies with the SEC in 1998 and 1999 showed that few companies sufficiently disclosed these financial risks or competitive impacts arising from exposure to known environmental uncertainties. The 10K report is an annual overview of a company's business, the 10Q is a quarterly report containing unaudited financial statements and a continuing view of the company's financial performance, and the 8K is a "current" report that includes any material events or changes not yet reported by the company. These reports are in the public domain and can be viewed at SEC's website or freeedgar.com.

WRI and Calvert contend that the SEC is not thoroughly enforcing Item 303 of Regulation S-K, which requires companies to disclose any known risks and uncertainties that are likely to affect future financial performance. They point to the fact that of the more than 5,000 proceedings initiated by the SEC over the last 25 years, only three were based on alleged insufficient disclosure of environmental liabilities. During that same period, the SEC has filed only one civil action against a company on the grounds of inadequate environmental disclosure.

John Heine, spokesperson for the SEC, said the agency is aware of the studies, and "we appreciate that interested parties have brought this issue to our attention." He also said the SEC did not have a formal proposal at this time regarding rulemaking in this area, and he refused to comment about possible SEC responses.

As a solution, WRI and Calvert suggest that the SEC issue guidelines to clarify and strengthen the rules regarding disclosure under Item 303 of Regulation S-K. According to Duncan Austin, this has already been done for SuperFund-related reporting. WRI and Calvert also are urging the SEC to fulfill previous commitments to allocate more resources to enforcement, and ensure that companies comply with environmental disclosure requirements.

The results of the WRI studies indicate that information affecting financial performance is not being adequately disclosed to shareholders. Clarifying environmental liability and risk may be a complex task, but it is a task worthy of the effort. Investors need, and deserve, increased transparency.

http://www.wri.org
http://www.calvert.com
http://www.sec.gov
http://www.sec.gov/edgarhp.htm
http://www.freeedgar.com

© SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it

Related Articles

Top

Mutual Funds | Community Investing | News | Sustainability Reports | Corporate Research | Shareowner Actions | Financial Services | Conferences
Home | Login | Contact | Support This Site | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints


© 1998-2008 SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Created and maintained by
SRI World Group web development services
Do your own research Work with an advisor SRI News SRI Learning Center Home