SocialFunds.com
Please support our sponsors



Subscribe to Free weekly SRI News Alerts

Keyword Search
Find SRI News Articles Related To:

Complete List of Articles by Category

RSS
What is RSS?
Add to MyYahoo

Please support our sponsors


Recent News Headlines from SocialFunds.com

ESG Criteria Creeping Slowly into Mainstream Investing (08/28/08)

Getting on Board with Corporate Social Responsibility (08/25/08)

Google Heats Up Next Generation Geothermal Energy (08/22/08)


Sustainability Investment News Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it  

August 07, 2002

Book Review: The Ecology of the New Economy
    by William Baue

A collection of essays identifies how the new digital economy both upgrades and downgrades the environment without predicting which trend will prevail.

SocialFunds.com -- In their introduction to The Ecology of the New Economy, editors Jacob Park and Nigel Roome propose four distinctions between the information, communications, computing and electronic (ICCE) technologies and more mature technologies. However, they number only three of these distinctions, leaving readers to guess whether or not they deliver a fourth, and what exactly that fourth distinction might be.

Visit the
Prospectus Ordering CenterThis phenomenon neatly encapsulates the dynamic of the entire collection of essays. The collection acts as a tour guide through the jungle of conflicting information about the environmental impacts of the new digital economy. However, when it comes time to end the tour, the collection leaves us stranded.

The book’s incomplete status mirrors the current state of research. The book’s subtitle, Sustainable Transformation of Global Information, Communications and Electronics Industries, with its emphasis on transition, suggests as much. Simply stated, our culture has yet to arrive at any conclusive assessment of the ecology of the new economy.

“There is no general answer to the question of whether the use of new media will lead to increased or decreased environmental impacts,” writes Klaus Fichter, director of the Berlin-based Borderstep Institute for Innovation and Sustainability, in the first chapter.

Readers seeking to understand the myriad factors that influence the debate over the environmental and social sustainability of ICCE technologies stand to gain insight. The book consists of 18 chapters written by nearly 30 academic, corporate, and independent researchers from Europe, Asia, and the U.S. A sample of the arguments regarding the sustainability of the new economy gives a sense of the book’s breadth.

James Wilsdon is the head of strategy at Demos, a UK-based independent think-tank. He cites a Forum for the Future survey of dot.com entrepreneurs’ attitudes toward environmental and social responsibility in his chapter, “Dot.Com Ethics: E-business and Sustainability.” The survey reveals a disjunction between ideology and practice. The majority of these new economy executives believe in the value of sustainability, but most of them fail to ensure that their businesses measure or manage environmental and social impacts. Instead of condemning these executives, Mr. Wilsdon explains that the reasons behind this disjunction are a lack of perceived impacts, time, expertise, and resources. Solutions to this dilemma remain largely hypothetical, as Mr. Wilsdon documents very few examples of business activities that meet the ideal of sustainability.

In another chapter, “The Internet and Sustainability Reporting: Improving communication with stakeholders” William B. Weil and Barbara Winter-Watson of Environmental Resources Management discuss the benefits and liabilities of corporate sustainability reports. The authors explain that social investors’ demands for greater transparency regarding corporate environmental practices have helped drive the increase in corporate sustainability reporting. Unfortunately, corporate obfuscation of environmental performance persists.

The chapter’s final section, “Future reporting trends,” ends abruptly with a statistical comparison of FTSE 100 firms that contract third-party verification of sustainability reports (65 percent) and Fortune 100 companies that do (12 percent). Although this is an interesting fact, it is not a chapter conclusion.

The collection similarly lacks a conclusion or an afterword, though the introduction does end with a summary of the conclusions that arise from the collection.

“What we can say conclusively is that both sides are right and wrong, and the answer almost always depends on the context and circumstances surrounding the use of ICCE technologies,” the editors state.

This vague language, which sounds as if it were borrowed from a corporate annual report, accurately conveys the inconclusive status of the debate over the ecology of the new economy.

The Ecology of the New Economy: Sustainable Transformation of Global Information, Communications and Electronics Industries edited by Jacob Park and Nigel Roome. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, England: 2002.

© SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Order reprints | Send it to a friend | Print it | Save it

Top

Mutual Funds | Community Investing | News | Sustainability Reports | Corporate Research | Shareowner Actions | Financial Services | Conferences
Home | Login | Contact | Support This Site | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints


© 1998-2008 SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Created and maintained by
SRI World Group web development services
Do your own research Work with an advisor SRI News SRI Learning Center Home