SocialFunds.com



Subscribe to Free weekly SRI News Alerts

Keyword Search
Find SRI News Articles Related To:

Complete List of Articles by Category

RSS
What is RSS?


Recent News Headlines from SocialFunds.com

Climate Scientist Joins Exxon Board (02/03/17)

Investors Challenge Mutual Funds on Proxy Voting (01/20/17)

Many Large Mutual Funds Continue Failure to Address Climate Change (01/07/17)


Sustainability Investment News Order reprints | Print it | Save it  

January 31, 2013

Portfolios Can Thrive After Fossil Fuel Divestment
    by Robert Kropp

As students on campuses across the country respond to climate change by calling on universities to divest fossil fuel holdings, an analysis reveals that divestment could add little financial risk to portfolios.

SocialFunds.com -- Spurred in part by an article published in Rolling Stone last summer, and looking to the anti-apartheid divestment campaign of the 1970s as an example, students on campuses in the US are organizing to pressure their colleges and universities to divest their holdings in fossil fuel companies.

The Rolling Stone article, entitled Global Warming's Terrifying New Math, was authored by Bill McKibben of 350.org. "We know how much we can burn, and we know who's planning to burn more," McKibben wrote. "Climate change operates on a geological scale and time frame, but it's not an impersonal force of nature; the more carefully you do the math, the more thoroughly you realize that this is, at bottom, a moral issue."

With help from organizations like the Brooklyn-based Responsible Endowments Coalition, which seeks to make sustainable investment a common practice at colleges, students have met with some early successes. In November, the trustees of Unity College in Maine voted to divest the institution's holdings in fossil fuel industries. "The time is long overdue for all investors to take a hard look at the consequences of supporting an industry that persists in employing a destructive business model," Unity College President Stephen Mulkey stated at the time.

However, as a recent New York Times article pointed out, "No school with an endowment exceeding $1 billion has agreed to divest itself of fossil fuel stocks." After 72% of Harvard students voted in favor of a divestment policy, a university spokesperson said, "Harvard is not considering divesting from companies related to fossil fuels."

Indeed, a report published last year by the IRRC Institute and the Tellus Institute found that most endowments now lag behind mainstream institutional investors in the uptake of environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) investment criteria.

College administrators argue that fiduciary duty compels them to maximize returns, a position that ignores the social impacts of corporate externalizing of costs as well as the crisis of climate change. But even if one were to construct a portfolio today, would excluding fossil fuel industries from it necessarily harm short-term returns?

According to a recent an alysis by Patrick Geddes of Aperio Group, the impact could be negligible. Geddes found that even a portfolio that excluded all fossil fuel companies would incur significantly less financial risk than would the practice of active stock selection.

"Screening negatively affects a portfolio's risk and return," Geddes concluded, "but…the impact may be far less significant than presumed."

Investment products that exclude fossil fuel industries are available to investors. The Green Century Balanced Fund does not invest in fossil fuel or nuclear power companies, but focuses on companies committed to protecting the environment and disclosing their sustainability performances. Nearly seven percent of the Fund's assets are in the Renewable Energy and Efficiency sector.

The Fund is managed by Trillium Asset Management, whose Sustainable Opportunities investment strategy avoids oil and gas investment.

Speaking before the Vermont legislature this week, McKibben said, "Please join the growing number of colleges and governments divesting their holdings in fossil fuel companies. These companies are the ones spending the big lobbying bucks to make sure change never happens in DC and other capitals. Please help undermine their legitimacy by removing the state's pension funds, the UVM endowment, and other holdings from their shares."

"As the mayor of Seattle said last month, why would they simultaneously spend millions building new seawalls and invest in the companies making that necessary?" McKibben continued.

© SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Order reprints | Print it | Save it

Related Articles

Top

Mutual Funds | Community Investing | News | Sustainability Reports | Corporate Research | Shareowner Actions | Financial Services | Conferences
Home | Login | Contact | Support This Site | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Reprints


© 1998-2017 SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Created and maintained by
SRI World Group web development services
Do your own research Work with an advisor SRI News SRI Learning Center Home