This is a non-graphical version of the article. To save, please use your
browser File/Save function.
July 25, 2011
Court of Appeals Strikes Down SEC Rule on Proxy Access
by Robert Kropp
The Court agreed with the Chamber of Commerce in finding that the rule, which would have allowed
shareowners to have their nominees for boards of directors included in proxy materials, was
"arbitrary and capricious."
Dealing a blow to the corporate governance concerns of sustainable investors and others, the US
Court of Appeals in Washington DC ruled last Friday that the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) "was arbitrary and capricious in promulgating Rule 14a-11." The rule, if it had been enacted,
would permit shareowners who have owned at least three percent of a company for at least three
years to have their nominees for boards of directors included in corporate proxy materials.
When the SEC adopted the rule for proxy access last August, Ann Yerger, executive
director of the Council of Institutional Investors
(CII), stated, "Access to the proxy will invigorate board elections and make boards more
responsive to shareowners and more vigilant in their oversight of companies." And a CII press
release at the time stated, "The final rule reflects the SECís thorough, year-long review of
extensive public comments and a careful balancing of investor and corporate interests."
However, the US Chamber of Commerce disagreed, arguing that the rule would allow "activist
shareholders (to) use the rule as leverage to further their special interest agendas." In October,
the Chamber filed the lawsuit that was decided in its favor by the Court of Appeals last week.
The Court's decision was notable for its criticism of the Commission, stating that it
"failed adequately to consider the rule's effect upon efficiency, competition, and capital
"For these reasons and more," the Court continued, "We grant the petition for
review and vacate the rule."
In a press
release, Yerger called the decision "deeply disappointing," and said, "We will continue to
advocate for proxy access and will encourage the SEC to promptly address the court's concerns.
Proxy access is a core shareowner right that is standard in many countries."
Cross, director of the Corporation Finance Division of the SEC, described the Commission as
"disappointed" by the ruling, but added, "We note that our rule allowing shareholders to submit
proposals for proxy access at their companies, which we adopted at the same time, is unaffected by
the court's decision."
According to Ted Allen of Risk
Metrics, "The unavailability of a market-wide access regime could mean a rise in traditional
boardroom challenges via proxy fights and a jump in 'just vote no' campaigns against directors. In
addition, the court decision may inspire activists to file access bylaw proposals at various
companies in 2012."
The SEC has 45 days from the date of the Court's decision in which to
seek judicial review.
SRI World Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.